21.02.2019
The article refers to the fact that procedural innovations in the part of expert justice have raised a number of problematic issues: theoretically, it is possible to require an examination of the vast majority of legal problems, since arguments can always be put forward that this or that relationship should be regulated differently, given applying an analogy to them. And the court’s refusal to properly assess the expert opinion can cast doubt on the validity and fairness of the judgment.